-> DN> I might remind you that your statement was 40 wins or more.. I
-> DN> you're not backing out of that agreement.
->
->I guess I have to remind you in EVERY OTHER MESSAGE that I said
->that it would be because of the return of their injured players,
->the influx of new talent and their new coach. Now, how is THAT
->backing out or do you still not understand that it is more than
->one factor that'll get them over the hump; just as it was more
->than one factor that caused their drop?
I'm tired of arguing the reasons.. there are differences of opinion here
that are only going to be resolved through pure numbers. And that number
stands at 40 wins..
Good luck, both you and the Cs will need it..
-*- TurboEDIT v1.60a+ [MSP96]
--- Ezycom V1.48g0 01fa0167
---------------
* Origin: Milky Way, Langley, BC [604] 532-4367 (1:153/307)
|