From: Jeff North 

On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 20:17:33 GMT, in alt.politics.homosexuality
"Patriot Games" 
 wrote:

>| "Jeff North"  wrote in message
>| news:gavf031oa87od75ug74ksspkuhglbh22pm{at}4ax.com...
>| > On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 14:58:47 GMT, in alt.politics.homosexuality

[snip]

>| >>| >>| >>| >>>>Show where Lott
committed incest....
>| >>| >>| >>| >>>Such a
"Christian" you are! Don't even know the Bible?
>| >>| >>| >>| >> Of course I know it...
>| >>| >>| >>| > And yet you asked the question...
>| >>| >>| >>| Because I KNEW Lott DIDN'T commit incest....
>| >>| >>| > American Heritage New Dictionary of Cultural
Literacy, Third
>| >>Edition
>| >>| >>| > incest
>| >>| >>| > Sexual relations between relatives who are
forbidden by law to
>| >>marry;
>| >>| >>| > for example, between father and daughter or
mother and son.
>| >>| >>| >>| I always prefer to have a liar out
themselves by they themselves
>| >>| >>posting
>| >>| >>| >>| that which traps them....
>| >>| >>| He was unconscious.  Physically immobile.  He was
raped.  He
>| >>therefore
>| >>| >>| didn't commit incest.  However, it was committed to him.
>| >>| > Yet God condoned the daughters actions and Lotss' inactions.
>| >>| And you can prove that how?
>| > Considering the he just destroyed 2 cities but couldn't stop 2
>| > pregnancies to continue until birth....
>|
>| Destroying 2 cities proves God didn't condon it.
>|
>| But why would God punish unborn fully innocent children?

Oh that's right. God preferred the children to be alive so that could be
dashed against the rocks. God also ensured that there were no pregnant
women when he flooded the earth, right?
---------------------------------------------------------------
jnorthau{at}yourpantsyahoo.com.au  : Remove your pants to reply
---------------------------------------------------------------

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag