From: "Phil Payne" 

> And notice that the crappy study had the largest number so you felt you
> had to include it.

As far as I can see from the URL I quoted, it's been sneered at by those I
would expectto sneer at it, but not even a substantive attack has been
mounted on it.  Note how keen Bliar has been to accept other studies using
the same methodology.  And the Lancet has not retracted, as it always does
when a story is proven false.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5