From: "Phil Payne" 

> >> A google for LANCET CASUALTIES FLAWED produces 26,600 hits.  Which
> >> publications would you be inclined to trust?

> > The Lancet.

> In other words, any publication which throws out crap you are predestined
> to believe.  Did you look at the Slate article I posted?

The Lancet has the advantage of integrity.  When it is proved wrong, it
always retracts - see the MMR story, for instance.

It has not retracted, nor has it been suggested by anyone (including Bliar)
that it should.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5