From: "Gary Wiltshire" 

On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 10:35:33 -0500, Adam field.near the bridge">
 wrote:

> Geo wrote:
>> "Adam"
<""4thwormcastfromthemolehill\"{at}the field.near the
bridge">
>> wrote in
>> message news:44169827$1{at}w3....
>>
>>
>>> Fine so let's get Iran etc armed now. I don't mind if every country
>>> down
>>> to dare I say it...Belgium...gets nukes. However the current
"system"
>>> is unsustainable & thus the choice remains - World full of nukes or
>>> World empty of nukes. To Say ""Oh
Britain/France/US/Russia/PRC are just
>>> so much more responsible with weapons of vast death &
terror" is not
>>> sustainable.
>>
>>
>> If you can't develop nukes in secret then you aren't in control enough
>> to
>> guarantee they won't get used by someone other than the government.
>>
> A) Nah coz The manhatten project was known to the British & Soviets &
> all subsequent nuclear programs have been detected.

Manhattan, certainly, but you have no way to ascertain or prove the rest of
your sentence.
>
> B) &? It's more about securing the weapons you have produced.
>
> Adam



--
Gary Wiltshire

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5