From: "Gary Wiltshire" 

On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 12:50:43 -0500, Bill Lucy  wrote:

> In article , gaw{at}sover.net
> says...
>> > "Bush Worst President" gets 33,300,000 hits on Google.
>> >
>> > So, *my* search is obviously more valid than yours.
>> >
>> > 
>>
>> I wasn't using the number of hits as proof of my point, but rather to
>> give
>> Phil a large number of places to look, since he obviously is going to
>> mistrust any single source I put forward.
>
> And I pointed out that 6 of the first 10 sites were  supportive of the
> Lancet article.

And I posted a Slate (hardly a shill for Bush) article which spelled out in
detail exactly what was wrong with the Lancet "study."  Are you
and your friends too lazy to read it or are the lot of you too chickenshit?

--
Gary Wiltshire

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5