From: "Gary Wiltshire" 

On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 15:53:48 -0500, Phil Payne
 wrote:

>> No, for the exact search I specified the numbers hits was exactly what I
>> said it was, and again, I'm not claiming that a large number of hits
>> means
>> I'm right, just giving you a large number of sources to pick and choose
>> from, since you will automatically denouce any source I cite.
>>
>> Now, my little govnyukh, are you going to respond to the Slate (hardly a
>> Bush fan publication) article I posted which explained EXACTLY what was
>> wrong with Lancet's misuse of statistics?
>
> http://crookedtimber.org/2004/11/11/lancet-roundup-and-literature-review
> about sums it up.
>
> Kaplan's knowledge and abuse of statistics are quite remarkable.
>
>

I see much speechifying and damned little countering statistics.

--
Gary Wiltshire

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5