On 29/05/17 20:47, alister wrote:
> On Mon, 29 May 2017 20:37:06 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>
>> On 29/05/17 20:33, alister wrote:
>>> On Mon, 29 May 2017 20:13:17 +0200, Jean-Pierre Kuypers wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article (Dans l'article) , alister
>>>>  wrote (écrivait) :
>>>>
>>>>> I don't trust Facebook to honour anything regarding privacy
>>>>
>>>> No problems with Facebook:
>>>> the users agreed all what Facebook does and makes:
>>>> this is in the policies...
>>>>
>>>> Cool!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> & how do you know these policy's are truly followed?
>>>
>>> Answerer you have to have trust in the person making the promises
>>
>> and his or her computer security
>
> yes, which leads to the frollowing truth table
>
> Trust person Trust Security use service
> No  No  No
> No  Yes  No
> Yes  No  no
> Yes  Yes  Yes
>
> For me column one is a gig no so column two is irrelevant

That is the nature of AND logic.

>>
>>
>>> Zuckerburg's history has lead me to make my own option regarding his
>>> trustworthiness.
>>>
>> And his computer security.
>
> See above
>
>> https://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/09/05/
> facebook_fanpages_are_being_hijacked/
>
>
>
>
>


--
"What do you think about Gay Marriage?"
"I don't."
"Don't what?"
"Think about Gay Marriage."

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05