Hello Mike.

23 Aug 07 10:53, you wrote to Michele Marie Dalene:

 ML> If DOSBOX is a different took than DOSEMU and DOSEMU isn't directly
 ML> being worked on for WINwhatever and so on, then some of the expected
 ML> issues relative to comm port use, old-time IRQ management, printing
 ML> needs and file name/directory coordination might get solved faster and
 ML> better, whatever that means, on an application development group
 ML> effort than spans multiple O/S needs.

Dunno, the twice I attempted to get DOSBOX to work, it failed miserably here, 
but there is another virtual-machine system someone mentioned awhile back, not 
VmWare, not M$-Virtual PC, not bochs, not qemu, tho some have had decent 
results with it ... , want to try it sometime, when I find it again ... , and 
the problem is it comes very highly recommended ... 

Must remember to go looking for it ... ,

Russell

--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5