From: "Gary Wiltshire" 

On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 08:19:26 -0500, Bill Lucy  wrote:

> In article , gaw{at}sover.net
> says...
>> > And I pointed out that 6 of the first 10 sites were  supportive of the
>> > Lancet article.
>>
>> And I posted a Slate (hardly a shill for Bush) article which spelled out
>> in detail exactly what was wrong with the Lancet
"study."  Are you and
>> your friends too lazy to read it or are the lot of you too chickenshit?
>
> Did you read the Lancet article, Gary?

Yes.
>
> I have already noted that the Slate article has also received some
> critique. I also infer that you didn't look very closely at the
> crookedtimber piece that Phil pointed you to. It does give some insight
> into the statistics.

I still see the basic complaints as valid.

--
Gary Wiltshire

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5