From: Bill Lucy 

In article , phil{at}isham-research.freeserve.co.uk says...
> > And I posted a Slate (hardly a shill for Bush) article which spelled out
> > in detail exactly what was wrong with the Lancet
"study."  Are you and
> > your friends too lazy to read it or are the lot of you too chickenshit?
>
> I've read it.  It's bollocks.
>
> Do a search on "Fred Kaplan lancet" and you'll find article
after article
> pointing out his errors.
>
> The one I just posted is about the best.  Read it and see if you can
> understand it.

I did a little looking and found this:

http://timworstall.typepad.com/timworstall/2004/11/eating_crow_and.html

which was because of this:

http://timlambert.org/category/LancetIraq/

A note to Gary: the Tim Lambert piece *does* have some statistics to gnaw on.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5