From: Bill Lucy 

In article , gaw{at}sover.net says...
> > And I pointed out that 6 of the first 10 sites were  supportive of the
> > Lancet article.
>
> And I posted a Slate (hardly a shill for Bush) article which spelled out
> in detail exactly what was wrong with the Lancet "study."  Are you and
> your friends too lazy to read it or are the lot of you too chickenshit?

Did you read the Lancet article, Gary?

I have already noted that the Slate article has also received some
critique. I also infer that you didn't look very closely at the
crookedtimber piece that Phil pointed you to. It does give some insight
into the statistics.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5