[ Quoting David Bowerman to Scott Little ] 
 SL> If the one piece of information is being accesses continually, a
 SL> large enough cache to hold all/most of it is beneficial. But when
 DB> machines.  However, delete the heavy duty -- even running 4
 DB> applications that were accessing the hard drive at the same time
 DB> showed no performance increase with an increase in the HPFS cache size
 DB> over 1.5MB.
Depends what you're doing. Actually, if you're doing it, it's not much of a
help. Cache would normally improve performance best when the computer is 
oing
everything on it's own (eg. network server). If someone is there operating 
t,
the slowest part of the system is usually the user (right up until the user
says to process the new input).
Regards,
 - Scott
[ admin@cyberia.asstdc.com.au | www.asstdc.com.au/~cyberia ]
--- FMail/Win32 1.22
3:712/848)
---------------