From: Ellen K. 

No, it means that the historical philosophical of the US does not support
allowing same-sex unions to be called "marriage".

On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 19:46:46 +0100, Adam
<""4thwormcastfromthemolehill\"{at}the field.near the
bridge"> wrote in
message :

>Ellen K. wrote:
>> What does that have to do with anything?
>>
>> Do you think any of the Founding Fathers would have supported
>> legislation allowing same-sex unions to be called "marriage"?
>>
>
>Neither would the Taliban so does that mean the founding fathers were
>judeo-christo-islamic?
>
>Adam
>
>> On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 09:44:40 +0000, Adam 
>> wrote in message :
>>
>>
>>>So it's not like the Pope or his adherents can claim any role in forming
>>>the US constitution etc.
>>
>>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5