From: Adam <""4thwormcastfromthemolehill\"{at}the field.near
the bridge">

Ellen K. wrote:
> No, it means that the historical philosophical of the US does not
> support allowing same-sex unions to be called "marriage".
>

Ditto Saudi Arabia or Iran.

So once more does that mean that the US is Judeo-Christo-Islamic?

I would appear to me that simple protestant christianity would cover this as well.

So I would appear that the Founding fathers & thus the country are low
church protestant.

Adam


> On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 19:46:46 +0100, Adam
> <""4thwormcastfromthemolehill\"{at}the field.near the
bridge"> wrote in
> message :
>
>
>>Ellen K. wrote:
>>
>>>What does that have to do with anything?
>>>
>>>Do you think any of the Founding Fathers would have supported
>>>legislation allowing same-sex unions to be called "marriage"?
>>>
>>
>>Neither would the Taliban so does that mean the founding fathers were
>>judeo-christo-islamic?
>>
>>Adam
>>
>>
>>>On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 09:44:40 +0000, Adam

>>>wrote in message :
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>So it's not like the Pope or his adherents can claim any
role in forming
>>>>the US constitution etc.
>>>
>>>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5