From: "Patriot Games" 

"Darrell Stec"  wrote in
message news:56qjpcF2a0s3hU1{at}mid.individual.net...
> After serious contemplation, on or about Monday 26 March 2007 11:01 am
> Patriot Games perhaps from Crazy_Bastard{at}Yahoo.com wrote:
>> "Darrell Stec" 
wrote in message
>> news:56o7a9F2310meU2{at}mid.individual.net...
>>> After serious contemplation, on or about Sunday 25 March 2007 2:13 pm
>>> Patriot Games perhaps from Crazy_Bastard{at}Yahoo.com wrote:
>>>> "Jeff North"  wrote
in message
>>>> news:0ovb039l18tiqolj21a7ao3lpilu2q8odl{at}4ax.com...
>>>>> On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 18:24:21 GMT, in alt.politics.homosexuality
>>>>> "Patriot Games" 
>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>| "Dionisio"
 wrote in message
>>>>>>| news:4604983c$0$24755$4c368faf{at}roadrunner.com...
>>>>>>| > Patriot Games wrote:
>>>>>>| >> "Dionisio"
 wrote:
>>>>>>| >>>Patriot Games wrote:
>>>>>>| >>>>Show where Lott committed incest....
>>>>>>| >>>Such a "Christian" you are!
Don't even know the Bible?
>>>>>>| >> Of course I know it...
>>>>>>| > And yet you asked the question...
>>>>>>| Because I KNEW Lott DIDN'T commit incest....
>>>>> American Heritage New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy, Third
>>>>> Edition incest
>>>>> Sexual relations between relatives who are forbidden by law to
>>>>> marry; for example, between father and daughter or
mother and son.
>>>>>>| I always prefer to have a liar out themselves by
they themselves
>>>>>>| posting that which traps them....
>>>> He was unconscious.  Physically immobile.  He was raped.  He
>>>> therefore
>>>> didn't commit incest.  However, it was committed to him.
>>> If he was inebriated enough to be unconscious, how did he get an
>>> erection?
>> I'm not a doctor.
> You are not much of anything.  You could ask almost any woman (if you
> could get any to talk to you) who had experience with a man so drunk he
> was unconscious.

So you claim they never raped him?

They just thought they did.

>> Guess you never woke up in the middle of the night
>> with a boner...
> Not under the condition that I was so drunk I was unconscious.
>> Be patient, puberty will find you soon enough.
>>> That part was a bit of scribal rewrite to eliminate embarrassment.
>> Proof?
> One only needs to read the Hittite stories from which this one was
> borrowed.  Or maybe get an education in biblical criticism or
> scholarship.  It has been commonly considered a scribal rewrite by
> biblical scholars for several hundred years now.  Actually it has been
> questioned all the way back to the Early Christian fathers and even
> Jewish scholars predating the New Testament.
>>> Either he was conscious and knew what he was doing, or
>>> he was drunk and never had an erection in the first place.  My vote
>>> is on the former
>> Feel free to believe anything you want.
> We which was it?  Was he so drunk that he didn't know what he was doing?
> In that case, how did he maintain an erection (twice)?

How would I know, I wasn't there, I didn't write the story...

>> But remember, God told you to stop sucking dicks.

So you're claiming that the other fags were all LYING when they said Lott
committed incest?

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag