On Mon, 05 Mar 2001 00:40:45 -0600, pus bonum et laudabile
wrote:
>"Mad Hatter�" wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 04 Mar 2001 10:29:29 -0600, The Queen of Cans and Jars
>> wrote:
>>
>> >"Mad Hatter�" wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Sun, 04 Mar 2001 03:20:47 -0600, The Queen of Cans and Jars
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >"Mad Hatter�" wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> On Sun, 04 Mar 2001 02:50:28 -0600, The Queen of Cans and Jars
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >"Mad Hatter�" wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> On Sun, 04 Mar 2001 02:14:47 -0600, The Queen of Cans and Jars
>> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >And being read is the payment I receive. But I wouldn't expect a whore to understand
>> >> >> >> >> >such concepts.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> It must suck to not be able to understand yourself, huh Quef?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >It must suck, picking up some word from Raoul that you don't understand, and then
>> >> >> >> >misspelling it.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Actually I picked it up when I was in New York, during some kind of a
>> >> >> >> concert. As for misspelling it, well, I was never very good at
>> >> >> >> remembering peoples names.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >You're motherfucking right, there.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> been paid for any of your "serious" literature at all, groty?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >Have I ever *tried* to get paid? Do I *want* to get paid for writing?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> I think the more relevant question is who in their right mind *would*
>> >> >> >> >> pay anything for your writing?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >It really doesn't matter, since it's not for sale.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Well no, not when you can come to Usenet and get yer crap for free.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >And some of you pay dearly for my writings, anyway.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Well I don't know if wasting time on entertainment could be considered
>> >> >> >> paying dearly...
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> keep sending 'em in... you'll be a real writer one day.... :)
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >I've been a real writer since before you figured out WP 5.1.
>> >> >> >> >> >Or have you?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> Does your autobiographical writing about the consequences of not using
>> >> >> >> >> a condom properly really count as "real" writing though?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >Oops. You crapped your pants.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> I haven't plonked you yet Stupid, when I do though it most likely
>> >> >> >> won't be in my pants. `, )
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >I think it means 'pussyfart', btw.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> You certainly would know, huh Quef?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >But you'd know that if you didn't just randomly grab
>> >> >> >> >ideas from other people.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Theft from a single author is plagiarism.
>> >> >> >> Theft from two is comparative study.
>> >> >> >> Theft from three or more is research.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> -Mad Hatter
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Actually, theft is theft, gimble.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Tsk, tsk, resorting to pathetic one liners, yer starting to falter my
>> >> >> dear, do you need me to slow down, let you catch your breath? `, )
>> >>
>> >> >I need you to write something worth reading.
>> >>
>> >> I need you to give me a reason to. So far the extent of yer writing
>> >> skillz has been an ongoing colorful array of autoflame's and "you're
>> >> boring" accusation lames. Perhaps if you took a few hours to
>> >> recuperate you might feel more up to posting something that would
>> >> warrant an actual flame from me. In the mean time I'll leave your ass
>> >> blistering up to yourself, yer masochistic urges are more fun to watch
>> >> than participate in.. `, )
>> >>
>> >> -Mad Hatter
>> >
>> >In other words, even you know you're not worth a fuck.
>>
>> No, no Cupcake, you got it all wrong. See you're not worth giving a
>> fuck, that's the point. `, )
>>
>> -Mad Hatter
>I see.
Well it's good that you're able to see your own fuckups and
shortcomings. Now if only you can strive to better yourself...but
perhaps that's asking too much of a spankard like you. `, )
-Mad Hatter
|