From: John Cuccia 

On Wed, 05 Apr 2006 23:15:06 -0400, "Gary Wiltshire"
 wrote:

>On Wed, 05 Apr 2006 20:29:37 -0400, John Cuccia 
>wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 05 Apr 2006 20:03:36 -0400, "Gary Wiltshire"

>> wrote:
>>
>>> Ah, so far nobler would have been a photograph showing one soldier
>>> shooting another in the head?
>>
>> So you think pictures of executions are noble?  To go with your belief
>> that immolation in nuclear fire is smarmy?  I'm not sure what you are
>> getting at.
>>
>> Wait, are you asking why I used a picture of Hiroshima to argue my
>> point?  Is that what this is all about?
>>
>> Heck that's easy. It was the most graphic example I could think of an
>> event that proved the "laws and customs of war" to be conveniences
>> that are discarded when necessary.
>
>I didn't say "execution."  I said one soldier shooting
another in the head.

I typed "execution" because it was easier than typing "one
soldier..." and it was a bit less grammatically awkward than saying
"So you think pictures of one soldier shooting another in the head are
noble?"  The meaning is the same in either case.

By now I have no idea what point you might be trying to make, or even if
you are trying to make one.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5