Martin Gregorie wrote:
> So? I hate things that wiggle and flash on web pages so don't use 'em.
> Instead I concentrate of creating readable, tolerably well-formatted
> pages that are free of annoying doodads. If that's naive, so be it.
Exactly, although I have wriiten and used some JS where it really
provided a benefit -- but very sparingly and only as a nice and well
worth-it add-on.
Besides I have exactly one CSS per site and those are 90 % identical
across sites. Of course they were thoroughly validated and tested, but
that was quite some time ago by now. On the other hand I do write and
update a lot, so that's where the current testing goes.
An yes, Deloptes is right, testing and validating CSS is quite a bit
more involved and tricky than sinmple HTML. Keep it simple, structured,
and logical goes a long way but is quite hard to do in CSS.
--
/¯\ No | Dipl.-Ing. F. Axel Berger Tel: +49/ 221/ 7771 8067
\ / HTML | Roald-Amundsen-Straße 2a Fax: +49/ 221/ 7771 8069
X in | D-50829 Köln-Ossendorf http://berger-odenthal.de
/ \ Mail | -- No unannounced, large, binary attachments, please! --
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | FidoUsenet Gateway (3:770/3)
|