->> He probably fell on the floor laughing.
->> OTOH, you did not say psychologists did not *HAVE* to be licensed.
->> You said there is no licensing required in psychology.

EC>> Yeah, THERE'S a way out, Bob!  You can try to distinguish
between "have
EC>> to" and "required!"  That will just slide right by people!

 SH> You realize, of course, that this thread will go on for
 SH> five years.  Three weeks from now, Klahn will have twisted
 SH> it with so many distortions and lies that the thread will
 SH> not be recognizable.

 You are the liar here. This thread will go on because you and
 your lapdogs will spin it out with lies and distortions.

 My point is clear, and steady. Mimi claimed that there are *NO
 licensing required. There is licensing required.

 She verified her statement when she said psychologists get
 certification, not licensed.

 Now I apologize for giving you a serious response. I forget, you
 have no interest in serious discussion. All you are interested
 in is smear and attack.


BOB KLAHN bob.klahn{at}sev.org   http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn

 * Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5a