From: "George J. Sherwood" 

Adam wrote:


> So remind me, from the moment someone said "oy Padilla stop right
there"
> till someone said "these are the charges your honour"  what was the
> timeframe?

So which part of held as an enemy combatant is so hard to understand?  At
the point there isn't a timeframe.  Whether it was legal or not to hold him
as an enemy combatant is up to the courts to decide.


>
> Oh I hope he's waterboarded. After all he's kewl with it & according to
> this:
>
> ""According to the sources, CIA officers who subjected
themselves to the
> water boarding technique lasted an average of 14 seconds before caving in.
> "
>
> it'll be quick & thus efficient & thus save the taxpayer a
bundle & I
> thought he was in favour of keeping the cost of government down....

What is with you and the waterboard?  Exactly what would be your purpose
for this?  None, it is just a way to add something that doesn't make sense
here.  You are saying that we are using the waterboard in prisons or in
courts?



> Shrug. All pols, perjure it's their job. You have to promise everything
> to everyone while knowing that's impossible.
>

All pols perjure themselves in court?  I don't think so, if you are saying
all make campaign or promises that are not always carried out or even meant
to be carried out, yes.  But that is a far cry from perjury.

George

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5