AJ> information put out on the computer forums was grossly non-factual 
AJ> from
AJ> the gitgo.  To their credit, the local papers did give the facts as 
AJ> they
AJ> knew them, 
    Being that the more recent things on the "computer forums" I've seen 
include what is allegedly news clips from the Pocono (Pennsylvania) paper, 
what part of the incident was _not_ reported factually?
    Were the kids' genitals examined without their consent and opportunity to 
not be examined?
    Was parental permission obtained in any way consistent with the medical 
and legal norms for "informed consent", or did permission slips just not have 
a complete description of what would be done?
--- Simplex BBS (v1.07.00Beta [DOS])
---------------