From: "Robert G Lewis" 

I've seen. And I know enough to realize that if I give my money that it is
different from my client giving money. It is a complicated situation but
like or not his money went to republicans. Those clients appear to have
increased money to Republicans and in some cases decreased money to
democrats.. Say he participated equally is amusing.


As I said before you appear to have an absolute hatred of democrats. Based
on your words and your excuses for the actions of various republicans.

Statements like "Just a bunch of corrupt democraps."  Are there
corrupt Democrats Sure. And it would seem a LOT of corrupt Republicans.

"Gary Britt"  wrote in message
news:44343811$1{at}w3....
> Its not necessary for one without eyes to feel sorry for one they
> mistakenly
> think is blind.  There is no difference between Abramhoff money and
> Abramhoff client money.  Abramhoff directed the money in either case.
> Open
> your eyes and stop dancing on the head of pins.  Abramhoff participated
> equally in bribing/influencing as many politicians of both parties as he
> could.
>
> So far the only thing he's being tried for that I've seen has nothing to
> do
> with lobbying, but rather fraudulent representations to dupe a bank into
> loaning 60 million dollars on something they otherwise wouldn't have
> loaned
> money on.
>
> Gary
>
> "Robert G Lewis"  wrote in message
> news:4433e602{at}w3....
>> About as accurate as your prior statement " Just a bunch of corrupt
>> democraps.".
>>
>>
>> You might want to actually look at Abramhoff. ALL of his personal
>> contributions were to Republicans. His clients moneys were split between
>> parties. Look into the donations from before they were his clients and
>> compare to after,  He was very active in the Republican party.
>>
>> Yes Gary we are well aware of your hatred of democrats. Pity it blinds
>> you
>> so much. I actually feel sorry for you.
>>
>> "Gary Britt"  wrote in message
>> news:44333573{at}w3....
>> > Any proof they are part of a joint enterprise acting together as
>> > co-conspirators in corruption?  As many democraps as repubs took
>> > abramhoff/client money.  Abramhoff has nothing to say about Delay, even
>> > though he's cooperating.  Delay had a couple bad former staffers.
> That's
>> > why they are former staffers perhaps.
>> >
>> > The only corrupt acting together as co-conspirators that I see are the
>> > public heads of the national democrapic party.  They would sell their
>> > souls
>> > and their mothers for power.  That is their only principle and I
>> > despise
>> > them more for lying about and hiding who and what they are in a manner
>> > only
>> > done by democraps.
>> >
>> > Gary
>> >
>> > "Robert G Lewis" 
wrote in message
>> > news:4432dd84{at}w3....
>> >> So why have two of Delay's former staff members plead guilty, along
> with
>> >> Duke Cunningham etc.
>> >>
>> >> I don't think any of those are democrats.
>> >>
>> >> "Gary Britt"  wrote in
message news:4432d9bf$1{at}w3....
>> >> > There is no corrupt republican machine.  Just a
bunch of corrupt
>> >> > democraps.
>> >> >
>> >> > Gary
>> >> >
>> >> > "John Cuccia" 
wrote in message
>> >> > news:5fb532turvg0jo615iobusturak1oja848{at}4ax.com...
>> >> >> On Tue, 4 Apr 2006 11:55:13 -0400,
"Mark" 
> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>>I don't particularly care for Delay all that
much Monte. I said at
> the
>> >> >>>time
>> >> >>>that I didn't think it fair that he had to
step down as majority
>> >> >>>leader
>> >> >>>upon
>> >> >>>indictment, not conviction and I still feel that way.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>There's obviously no love lost between Earle
and Delay, and Earle
> won
>> >> >>>this
>> >> >>>battle. Time will tell, but I have a feeling
that Delay won't be
>> >> >>>convicted
>> >> >>>of anything.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Delay wouldn't be quitting if one or another of
the investigations
>> >> >> into the corrupt Republican political machine
wasn't getting very,
>> >> >> very close.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5