Poprocks wrote:
> Most sites are so over-loaded with JavaScript, HTML5 and other elements
> that they *need* quite a bit of overhead to fully display at all.

That's not the main point. Very few sites come even near to being valid.
90 % of the bloat (and the same share of the malware entry points) come
from trying to second guess, whatever the author might have meant by the
utter nonsense he wrote.

The world would be a much better place now, if early on all browser
vendors had agreed *not* to guess but simply display nothing but "syntax
error" on all non-valid pages.

Alas, that chance is long gone and so far away I find it hard to even
dream.


--
/¯\   No  |    Dipl.-Ing. F. Axel Berger    Tel: +49/ 221/ 7771 8067
\ /  HTML |    Roald-Amundsen-Straße 2a     Fax: +49/ 221/ 7771 8069
 X    in  |    D-50829 Köln-Ossendorf      http://berger-odenthal.de
/ \  Mail | -- No unannounced, large, binary attachments, please! --

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05