From: Adam <""4thwormcastfromthemolehill\"{at}the field.near
the bridge">

Phil Payne wrote:
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/01/AR20060401009
81_pf.html
>
> "There is also a growing consensus that Iran's agents would
target civilians
> in the United States, Europe and elsewhere, they said."
>
> Iran is not Iraq.  What would be an acceptable price for an attack on Iran's
> nuclear facilities in terms of collateral damage within the USA?
>
> A school or two?
>

A) There will be no UN approval for any action wrt Iran. This means it
might be a US only, Israel only or possibly US/Israel joint effort

B) None of the above are feasible in the wider view. Hormuz would be
closed. Oil would hit quite astonishing prices & While the Russians
would jump for joy (which is why they are helping the Iranians with Hormuz
closing tech) the PRC & India would be way less than chuffed.

I am curious who in Washington is planting these stories & why as they
are either more manifestations of the current admin's deep incompetance or
there are people who need to be re-leashed.

Adam

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5