From: "George Sherwood" 

On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 20:26:22 +0100, Adam wrote:

> George Sherwood wrote:
>> Adam wrote:
>>
>>> "I've constantly expressed my displeasure with leaks, particularly
>>> leaks of classified information."
>>>
>>> Answers on a postcard to.....
>>>
>>> Adam
>>
>> If the information is de-classified and authorized for release, it is
>> not a leak.  You can be critical of why the information was authorized
>> for release, but it is just silly to continue to call it a leak and go
>> back to this quote.
>>
>> George
>
> A constructive leak. i.e. it would appear by "outing" Plame via such a
> ruse one could leak info which even you (as prez etc) had not authorized
> for release.
>
> Did Mr Bush "authorize" the revealing of plame's job to the world ?
>
> Or was it "constructively leaked"?

And where are you coming up with this fact?  There is nothing in the filing
that even comes close.  This filing purely talks about the National
Intelligence Estimate.  No on has even been charged with the leaking of
Plame's name, not even Libby.  You are just speculating, I can make up any
story I want.

George

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5