From: Adam <""4thwormcastfromthemolehill\"{at}the field.near
the bridge">

George Sherwood wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 12:03:27 +0100, Adam wrote:
>
>
>> Chuckle. So another placed piece.
>>
>> Constructive leak.
>
> Yes, the Washington Post editorial page, always know as the mouthpiece for
> the Republican Administration.  You don't make any sense.  Of course my
> theories can look good if I brush everything the contradicts it off.
> Can't argue with that, it is impossible. You leave out of all the
> scenarios the credibility problems that Wilson had himself.  This is a big
> part of the case.
>
> George

Oh George ...

My my.



Is the New York Times also a mouthpiece for the Republican Administration?

& yet who was that woman....oh look she has her own wikipedia page...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judith_Miller_(journalist)

Who did she work for again?

You have to gauge your audience.

& which "bastions of the MSM liberal elite" did Novak &
Pincus work for?

People "give access" when they have something to say "in
private". As an "unnamed (but official) source" imparting
"secret knowledge"

Why? Why not have Mr Libby simply make the case up front if releasing
possibly 3'rd party sourced information for what are in effect
ideological/party political reasons is such a swell idea?

Adam

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5