From: "Geo" 

"John Beckett"  wrote
in message news:9bop321jhc1d0p5qk4jn9jsf0as7pnb9ev{at}4ax.com...

> The arguments of scientists like Paul Davies are more sophisticated and
> much more detailed than the observations that we have made here. There is
> a certain set of magic numbers in physics (the constants in the
> fundamental equations). The argument is that these numbers have values
> that are essential for a universe, complex elements, molecules, cells,
> life - if the numbers were even slightly different, nothing we see would
> exist.

Do you mean numbers like the speed of light or "e" or do you mean
numbers like the relationship between the sides of a triangle? Seems to me
one is based on the universe while the other is based on the mathmatical
and number system (base 2, 8, 10, 16 whatever).

Geo.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5