->> ->> I nominated her in January of 2007.

 EC>> Which has nothing to do with anything.  To review in case
 EC>> your confusion is real and not just being faked as a
 EC>> diversion, I posted what she said in August 2007, when you
 EC>> were doing your "we need a moderator" raving. And I pointed

->> The "we need a moderator" wisdom was started in January of 2007.

 EC> Which, again, has nothing to do with anything in this

 It has everything to do with it.

 EC> I posted what she said in
 EC> August 2007, when you were doing your "we need a moderator"
 EC> raving. And I pointed out that she did not want you to be
 EC> the moderator of that echo AT THAT TIME and that SHE blamed

 I *NOMINATED* her in January 2007, which is when we started
 discussing having a moderator. A simple fact that is key to the
 whole story. Yet you want to ignore because it doesn't suit your
 version of reality.

 EC>  You labelled my
 EC> statement a "lie" and you ignored the proof of its TRUTH.

 By now I do not recall what statement of yours I labeled a lie,
 but it probably was.

 EC> And now you have gone through several rounds of diverting
 EC> back to EARLIER comments that have nothing to do with what
 EC> she said AT THAT TIME.

 Actually, AT THAT TIME, has only to do with your desire to edit
 reality to suit your purposes.

->> She does not appear to share your beliefs on much of anything,
->> including me.

 EC> In the last week I have included a number of her opinions.
 EC> I could quote them again for you, if you have forgotten.

 You were selective in your posting. You ignore the original
 discussion, and you look only at the time she was getting
 frustrated. And you ignore the ultimate result, which was she
 *IS* the co-mod.

 IOW, you don't get to define reality.

BOB KLAHN bob.klahn{at}sev.org   http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn

 * Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5a