...

 EC>>> diversion, I posted what she said in August 2007, when you
 EC>>> were doing your "we need a moderator" raving. And I pointed

->> ->> The "we need a moderator" wisdom was started
in January of 2007.

->> Which, again, has nothing to do with anything in this thread.  To
 ...
BK>> It has everything to do with it.

 EC> Every time you fall back on a "does too" the only response
 EC> needed is "does not," but several times I went far beyond

 Since that started in Jan 2007, as I explained in the text you
 deleted, the point I made is valid, and your response is a
 fraud.

 EC> that and tried to explain so clearly that even you - if you

 As you bloviated upon. I am not required to accept your
 explanation as valid. My point stands. I nominated her Jan 10,
 2007. A fact you try to ignore.

->> By now I do not recall what statement of yours I labeled a lie

 EC> I told you exactly what the statement was, several times,

 You have lied so many times I cannot keep track. However, it
 doesn't matter, since it always involves you falsely accusing me
 of something. And since you didn't include it here, it's your
 failure.

 EC> plus it is still in the message base, and it would be in

 Like I said, you have lied so many times, and I have called you
 on it so many times, I could look in the base or my archives,
 but I won't know which of your lies you are talking about.

 EC> those archives you talk so much about.  So that leads to
 EC> one of two conclusions.

 It leads to one conclusion, you lie so much it's hard to keep
 track.

 ...

 EC> several occasions you have expressed the view that any time
 EC> someone calls YOU a "liar" and cannot back it up that makes
 EC> their accusation a "lie."

 Well, yeah... it is a lie. Not just when they can't back it up,
 since they can never  back it up, because it didn't happen, it
 is always a lie. *DUH!*


BOB KLAHN bob.klahn{at}sev.org   http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn

 * Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5a