From: "Phil Payne" 

Flight 93 was the only one that had a shred of plausibility for me - the
others were obviously rank nonsense. And again, the official account of 93
was quite plausible, too.


"Robert Comer"  wrote in
message news:443e6743{at}w3....
> > Oh, yea Bob (and George), I remember the stories, what I meant was they
> > were never "mysteries" to me, as I never bought into
them for a second.
>
> That works for me too.
>
> --
> Bob Comer
>
>
> "Mark"  wrote in message
news:443e6099{at}w3....
> > Oh, yea Bob (and George), I remember the stories, what I meant was they
> > were never "mysteries" to me, as I never bought into
them for a second.
> >
> > Popular Mechanics has had a number of good articles on a variety of
> > subjects that I wouldn't have necessarily thought they'd cover
> > (Instapundit has been linking to them quite a bit).
> >
> >
> > "Robert Comer" 
wrote in message
> > news:443e5d53{at}w3....
> >> Don't you remember the low flying white jet that supposedly shot it
down
> >> and the distribution of the wreckage stories looked like it exploded in
> >> the air...
> >>
> >> --
> >> Bob Comer (I never believed it myself)
> >>
> >>
> >> "Mark"  wrote in message
news:443e4be3$1{at}w3....
> >>>
> >>> "Phil Payne"
 wrote in message
> >>> news:443e359a$1{at}w3....
> >>>> The "whether it was shot down" mystery.
> >>>
> >>> I don't remember that "mystery."
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5