| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | COFFEE_KLATSCH |
EC>> Which has nothing to do with anything. To review in case EC>> your confusion is real and not just being faked as a EC>> diversion, I posted what she said in August 2007, when you EC>> were doing your "we need a moderator" raving. And I pointed -> ->> The "we need a moderator" wisdom was started in January of 2007. -> Which, again, has nothing to do with anything in this thread. To -> review in case your confusion is real and not just being faked as a -> diversion, I posted what she said in August 2007, when you were doing -> your "we need a moderator" raving. And I pointed out that she did not -> want you to be the moderator of that echo AT THAT TIME and that SHE -> blamed YOU for the whole mess. And I posted her exact words, to you, -> at that time, saying exactly that! You labelled my statement a "lie" -> and you ignored the proof of its TRUTH. And now you have gone through -> several rounds of diverting back to EARLIER comments that have -> nothing to do with what she said AT THAT TIME. And you keep on -> mumbling irrelevancies as if it will change the facts. BK> It has everything to do with it. Every time you fall back on a "does too" the only response needed is "does not," but several times I went far beyond that and tried to explain so clearly that even you - if you were to make any effort to kickstart your brain - would understand. -> By now I do not recall what statement of yours I labeled a lie I told you exactly what the statement was, several times, plus it is still in the message base, and it would be in those archives you talk so much about. So that leads to one of two conclusions. Either you are admitting that you throw the word around so casually that it is meaningless AND you are admitting that you don't even read through the posts before you send your knee-jerk responses out, OR you have sought refuge in a lie about your memory. Which is it? Of course, by your definition of the term, your non-defense of your earlier accusation is already established as a lie. On several occasions you have expressed the view that any time someone calls YOU a "liar" and cannot back it up that makes their accusation a "lie." --- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 10* Origin: (1:226/600) SEEN-BY: 10/1 3 34/999 90/1 106/1 120/228 123/500 140/1 226/0 236/150 249/303 SEEN-BY: 250/306 261/20 38 100 1381 1404 1406 1410 1417 1418 266/1413 280/1027 SEEN-BY: 320/119 633/260 267 712/848 800/432 2222/700 2320/100 105 200 2905/0 @PATH: 226/600 123/500 261/38 633/260 267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.