-> EC> You mean the times I specify what you made up, I explain
-> EC> why and how you made it up, and I illustrate for you what
-> EC> you could post to DEFEND yourself against the accusation.

-> EC> You never do defend yourself, so for you to wish them away
-> EC> en masse is just hilarious.

-> You do not get to decide what I have to do to defend myself.

Each and every person can see what you SHOULD do to defend yourself.
When you claim that I said something, you should post my words, not your
dishonest paraphrases.  When you claim that Michael Scheuer admitted
something, you should quote his words.  In this particular thread, I
commented on a string of messages posted to you in August of 2007.  You
called my comment a "lie."  You failed to indicate WHAT about it was a
"lie," you failed to show that it WAS in fact a "lie," and you
completely ignored the posted quoted that proved it was NOT a lie.  So,
by YOUR definition, your accusation was a lie.

As for your diversion about what you "have to do," you can relax.  No
one can be required to do the impossible.  And you defending yourself is
impossible.  You were not up to the task as a child, and you still
aren't.

--- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 10