On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 22:50:03 -0800, RobertVB  wrote:

>In article ,
> wrote:
>
>> In a homosexual marriage the married partners cannot procreate. In a
>> heterosexual marriage they can. Based on this fact some heterosexuals
>> are forbidden from marrying. Homosexuals, however, being unable to
>> procreate are not subject to the limitation set down in the law.
>>
>> You're proven wrong.
>
>Actually you have just proven yourself wrong.  There are no Canadian
>citizens that are not allowed to marry because they might procreate.
>They do disallow certain relations from marrying each other, but those
>will hold true for all citzens no matter what their sexual orientation.
>
>It is in fact on of the specific Act mention in the C-38 bill when
>submitted:
>
>Marriage (Prohibited Degrees) Act
>13. Subsection 2(2) of the Marriage (Prohibited Degrees) Act is
>replaced by the following:
>
>(2) No person shall marry another person if they are related lineally,
>or as brother or sister or  half-brother or half-sister, including by
>adoption.
>
>14. Subsection 3(2) of the Act is replaced by the following:
>
>(2) A marriage between persons who are related in the manner described
>in subsection 2(2) is  void.
>
>
>Face it, you are wrong once again.

No, it will be just a short while before all that "you can't marry a
blood relative" rhetoric is challenged by queer brother or sisters who
want to marry. And the challenge will come on the grounds that they,
unlike heterosexual brothers or sisters (should they be allowed to
marry) present no hazard of bringing mentally impaired children into
the world because they, being  queer and of the same sex are incapable
of producing children. It will happen. It's just a matter of time.
Hide and watch.



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/20/05 7:59:03 AM ---