ivaluemyprivacy{at}mailblocks.com wrote:
> False accusation in family law cases
>
> Sunday March 20th 2005
>
>
> Sir - John Fitzgerald is to be complimented on highlighting the plight
> of those who are falsely accused of abuse (letters, 13th March 2005).
>
> While his letter deals with those who are falsely accused of abuse in
> residential institutions there are many other circumstances in which
> people, especially men, are falsely accused.
>
> In family law cases, false allegations of child abuse and especially
> domestic violence are now commonplace and are accepted by those working
> in this area as a legitimate tactic. In the unnecessarily adversarial
> family law system, the temptation to resort to such despicable tactics
> is increased by the knowledge that, even when the allegations are
> proven to be false and malicious, no penalties are imposed on the
> guilty parties.
>
> If the penalties matched the crime there would be fewer false
> allegations. There is also the fact, as pointed out by Mr Fitzgerald,
> that in these cases the accused person is deemed to be guilty until
> proven innocent - a virtually impossible task in most cases. Those who
> contact Amen say that, because these accusations are dealt with under
> civil law, they are denied the safeguards available to those who are
> accused of crimes.
>
> These allegations have a devastating effect on innocent men and their
> families and leave them deeply traumatised. Even if they succeed in
> proving their innocence, the ordeal causes long-term damage to them
> and, in many cases, their children.
>
> It is time all forms of false allegations were criminalised and
> appropriate penalties provided for those who use these dastardly
> tactics, usually to achieve advantage in family disputes or simply for
> monetary gain.
>
> Mary T Cleary,
> Amen,
> Navan.
>


Oh boy. I have been banging on about this for
over a quarter of a century.

As far as I am concerned the divorce courts are
simply an open cheque for the female to accuse
as she pleases and he is guilty on accusation. A
theoretical  presumption of innosence is not
worth wasting words on.

I have had my life completely destroyed by a
psychopathic female and her feminist freinds,
who I still believe encouraged her to get a divorce.

Psychogically I have never recovered but, the
twisted LYING filth in blue have prosecuted me
for daring to warn of the dangers.

That's right, dear reader, in this great country
of ours (UK), it is the victim who gets
prosecuted by the shite in blue not the criminal.

The last response I got from someone at the Law
Society suggested that the situation would
unlikely be addressesd because of the years that
have passed. It is because the legal system
failed to deal with the situation properly in
the first place that the period of time has passed.

D.


--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/20/05 12:59:13 PM ---