From: Adam <""4thwormcastfromthemolehill\"{at}the field.near
the bridge">

Gary Britt wrote:
> Imagine that Monte has absolutely no clue of the psychology of bureaucracies
> and the petty grudges of people who don't want their bureaucracy changed.
> Anyone with a brain whose ever worked in a large organization knows full
> well and first hand how change adverse some people can be.  Rumsfeld has
> been reforming and changing the military, its operations, its budgeting, its
> programs, its structure, etc. since first coming to office.  If he didn't
> make a few change adverse generals upset then THAT would be something to
> worry about.
>
> Over the past 5 years 100's and 100's of generals have retired, been passed
> over, been pushed out of the military and only 4 or 5 out of these 100's
> come forward to bitch when it is in their own pecuniary and petty interests
> to so do.
>
> Only a non-nuanced imbecile (i.e. Monte et al) would consider these people
> anything but petty change adverse, passed over for promotion, bureaucrats.
> Seeking revenge on the guy who isn't as milk toasty as the incompetent
> defense secretary's to whom they grew accustomed under Clinton.
>
> Gary
>
> Don't reply Monte, we know you have no defense to these comments.
>

It is truly sad to see the extent the right is having to go to to try &
justify the patently incompetent. It's like a big fat "Brownie, you're
doing a heck of a job" no matter how crap the job done actually is.

One minute it's all "we must listen to the mil" & then when
the mil start to find their voice it's "destroying the morale of the
boys at the front" even where such boys probably are quietly cheering
these people on.

Sad.

Adam

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5