From: "Gary Britt" 

NOPE.  Ones with the courage of their convictions and integrity would
resign their commissions and make public their reasons for so doing.  Since
none have done this, must not be all that big a deal or they don't have any
integrity.

That's why your comments about active duty generals are just your usual bullshit.

Gary

"Adam" <""4thwormcastfromthemolehill\"{at}the
field.near the bridge"> wrote in message news:444163cb$1{at}w3....
> Robert G Lewis wrote:
>> And while we are talking about listening Gary
>>
>> SEC. RUMSFELD:  I don't know how many generals there have been in the
>> last
>> five years that have served in the United States armed services.
>> Hundreds
>> and hundreds and hundreds.  And there are several who have opinions.  And
>> there's nothing wrong with people having opinions.  And I think one ought
>> to
>> expect that.  When you're involved in something that's controversial, as
>> certainly this war is, one ought to expect that.  It's historic, it's
>> always
>> been the case, and I see nothing really very new or surprising about it.
>>
>> Note Rumsfeld's first three words.
>>
>
> & note that for a serving officer (possibly any US mil type) to make
> critical comments wrt the prez, vp, sec def etc is a crime under your
> mil law, so the only ones likely to go "on the record" must be by
> definition retired (assuming they wanted to avoid prison).
>
> Adam

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5