From: "Paul Ranson" 

FWIW

http://www.alexisparkinn.com/photogallery/Videos/2005_jet-vs-concrete-wall.wmv

helps slightly debunk the Pentagon conspiracy theorists.

Paul

"George Sherwood"  wrote in message
news:443ebddf{at}w3....
> On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 12:58:17 -0400, Monte Davis wrote:
>
>> "George Sherwood"  wrote:
>>
>>> This is the same group that believes that the
>>>Pentagon wasn't hit by a 757, because the damage doesn't match some
>>>cartoon version of what a building should look like after it is hit by an
>>>airplane and same group that believes that the World Trade Centers were
>>>brought down in a controlled demolition.
>>
>> They generated a horribly large fraction of the traffic over the last few
>> years on alt.folklore.urban, one of my favorite newsgroups -- both
>> directly and through cross-posting. I killfiled left and right, but some
>> of them keep changing addresses (presumably to dodge the Evil
>> CIA/Mossad/Trilateral Cover-Up Squad).
>
> My favorite was when people (talking about the Pentagon) would tell me
> that I am ignoring the science, it clearly wasn't an airplane.  Then when
> I would ask if they have seen how an airplane breaks up when it crashes
> (myself having attended Naval Aviation Safety School) or if their expert
> had seen this they would say no. But in their minds they were convinced
> there should have been this shape of a 757 in the side of the Pentagon. It
> was crazy. If you asked about the phone calls or the fact the bodies were
> found there of the people on the airplane, they would say the Government
> put them there. The fact that Boeing plane parts were found, ignored.
>
> If you are willing to accept everything on your side without facts and
> disregard facts on the opposite side as planted, it is impossible to talk
> any more about.
>
> George
>
> George

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5