Hello Ward.

29 May 04 15:31, you wrote to me:

>> Possibly.  But Ward has made some grave errors that are
>> 100% wrong.  His "interpretation" is wrong.  He tried to
>> redefine the voting in a situation where it is clearly
>> defined.

WD|> That is your "opinion".

And it is right.

WD|> However the IC has a 100% freedom to "interprete" as he/she pleases
WD|> whatever he/she considers worthy of an interpretation. By that virtue
WD|> alone it becomes a formal part of policy until overruled.

˙Section 7.2 leave no room for interpretatio:

==============

7.2  Selection

The International Coordinator is selected (or removed) by an absolute majori-
ty vote of the Zone Coordinators.

=============

Now where can you stick in an interpretaton here, hmm?  "˙n absolute
majority vote of the Zone Coordinators"

Let's see there are 6 Zone coordinators.  What's an absolute majority of 6, Ward?

There is nothing there that states /anything/ about the number of nodes in
each Zone.  Sorry, you are not IC.

WD|> I did not write those sections of policy, just used what was available
WD|> to act within the confines of P4.

Wrong!  You tried to "interpret" that which needs no
interpretation in order to keep the IC chair for life.

And it doesn't take a lawyer to see how wrong you are here.

Robert

--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-RuneKeep