In article ,
 Skinner1{at}hotmail.com wrote:

> On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 08:19:36 GMT, "Avenger"
 wrote:
>
> >
> >"Mark Sobolewski" 
wrote in message
> >news:mark_sobolewski-BC7C56.00454220032005{at}news.central.cox.net...
> >> In article ,
> >>  Grizzlie Antagonist  wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 21:19:37 -0800, Hardpan
 wrote:
> >> >
> >> > >On 18 Mar 2005 15:17:39 -0800,
hesacopontheedge{at}yahoo.com wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >>Sorry, but who wants geezers? -F.R.
> >> > >>
> >> > >>BACHELORS BEGIN TO LOSE UPPER HAND
> >> > >>The Wall Street Journal
> >> > >>Biological clock starts ticking for bachelors
looking for mates
> >> > >> By Nancy Anne Jeffrey
> >> > >>
> >> > >>Adam Rosen has a law degree from Villanova and trained in
> >> > >>psychology at Harvard. Hešs also handsome and
has a passion for social
> >> > >>causes. But therešs one thing the 37-year-old
bachelor doesnšt have
> >> > >>in hislife: candidates to be Mrs. Rosen.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > If he's a liberal ("passion for social
causes"), it's just as well
> >> > that he doesn't get a chance to propagate.
> >> >
> >> > But I don't believe for one moment that an older man
with money isn't
> >> > able to get married if that's what he wants.
> >
> >Even an older man who is broke can find a girl lol
> >
>
> That's a bold faced lie!

If the guy is decent looking, you'd be surprised.  I know
of men who were almost "gigilos" who could charm and BS their
way into a woman's bed.  Granted, the relationship
was unstable as hell but these men are out there.


>
> >
> >
> >> >
> >> > Notice that this article was written by a WOMAN.
> >>
> >> I concur.  This reads like feminist propoganda trying to
> >> offset all the 30 something women PANICKING from
> >> Bridget Jones and Hewlett.  I especially find it amusing
> >> how she openly lies about the interpretation of a statistic
> >> she cites:
> >>
> >> "The overall birthrate dropped 40% from 1955 to 1973"
> >>
> >> This is total crap first of all.  The "baby boom" referred
> >> to a period from 1945 through 1965 where the population
> >> INCREASED.  But let's take her at her word for a moment:
> >> There was a baby BUST from the mid-60's to the 70's with the
> >> second baby boom onward from the 80's (my understanding).
> >
> >Well that's good isn't it?
> >
>
> If you look at the birth rate in 1973 as compared PER CAPITA in 1955
> you will probably see a decrease of 40%. Now, think about that......

I'm talking about the author's claim.  I believe the next
baby boom began during the 80's.

> That's an 18 year range...... which means that all the young women of
> birthing age in 1955 would then be 18 years older and more than likely
> OUT of the Pregnancy range.  Ya THINK that might just total up to
> about a 40% difference?

Whether we're talking about 1973 or 1980, the number of women
YOUNGER than either age 32 to 25 are increasing with every
year (and the age range moves onward.)

This is very good news for men 25 to 32 today.

>
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Even so, if the population began to increase again,
> >> as SHE claims, from 1973, then this means that there
> >> are more women for every year after that starting with
> >> women aged 33 and YOUNGER!
> >>
> >> In other words, pity the poor men!  There are more and more
> >> YOUNGER women for them to date every year!  Yeah, that
> >> means men who can't find one of those aging Gen Xers will
> >> just have to settle for a more sexually active, attractive
> >> younger women.  Cantya just pity 'em? :-)
> >>
> >> She claims in the article that such services are scrambling
> >> to find women because of population increase but it's
> >> more likely that they want more members because men
> >> just tend to sign onto such services faster than shy,
> >> often less computer saavy women.
> >>
> >> I don't know what crack she's been smoking, but match.com started
> >> out with male to female ratios of 10 to 1 and now it's
> >> evening out.
> >>
> >> She must be Dan Rather's cousin to write up this "memo".
> >>
> >> regards,
> >> Mark Sobolewski
> >
>


--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/20/05 4:59:13 PM ---