From: Ad 

Robert Comer wrote:
> Let me restate that just a tad, it's true E=MC2 describes the
> conversion of mass to energy, it doesn't describe a nuclear explosion
> any more than any other mass to energy conversion vector, and in
> that's what I mean be it doesn't have anything to do with Nukes.
>

Huh? What? F=MA is just as applicable? Oppenheimer would be surprised.

Adam

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5