Richard Kettlewell wrote:

> NAT is not a security measure. People presumably assume it is because it
> is typically codeployed with an IPv4 firewall, but it’s the firewall
> that is protecting your network, not the NAT.

ISTR your construed example relies on packets to and/or from RFC1918
subnets managing to traverse the internet?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05