From: "Mark" 

I know it's not valid, as the National Guard hasn't been protecting our
borders since, forever, through no fault of their own.

But my point was that the argument against the decimation of their
readiness here on our land is just so much BS, as they've never been
employed to that end anyway.

If we're willing to allow illegal aliens to walk on over at their leisure,
and obviously we have been, and continue to be willing to let them do so,
why do we need a National Guard?  To do internal, far from our borders,
emergency recovery that governors can't handle on their own?

Where does that end? with a governor in North Dakota screaming for National
Guard help when a sink-hole sucks down a cabin, or worse a bear, somewhere
in the wilderness? 



"Rich Gauszka"  wrote in
message news:463fe2d5$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> The problem of the war with the National Guard is Bush tried to do it on
> the cheap and depleted the resources of the State's National Guard units
> in another attempt to hide the true cost of this war. War ain't cheap -
> nor should it be.
>
> Bringing up illegal aliens in an attempt to justify that depletion of
> resources isn't valid
>
>
> "Mark"  wrote in message
news:463fe138{at}w3.nls.net...
>>
>> "Randy"  wrote in message: It gets
worse-to restock the
>> Guard will take 5 years, even if the money is ready to be spent
>> yesterday.
>>
>> That's probably true. How many years will it take to stop illegal aliens
>> from walking/swimming across our border? How many American lives? Jobs?
>> Hospital Beds? Children? Will be lost?
>>
>> I guess, if only we weren't engaging in the wrong war, in the wrong
>> place, at the wrong time, that our National Guard could actually protect
>> our borders... > War" did it?>
>>
>>
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5