From: Ad 

Mark wrote:
> "Randy"  wrote in message
news:464111d8$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> Mark wrote:
>>> Well, hell Randy, I don't really don't give a shit if a fence
won't work,
>>> the border still has to be secured.
>>>
>>> I guess what we need then, is the National Guard on the border with lots
>>> of rounds of live ammunition until the illegal trespassers figure out
>>> that we're serious about stopping them. >> in Iraq and bring them on home>
>>>
>> Exactly. Rotary cannons would work wonders.
>>
>> Now pay for it.
>
> It's a freebie isn't it?
>
> First we surrender to Al Qaeda in Iraq, then we redeploy our troops to our
> southern border (which is only a bit farther than Murtha's Okinawa plan
> anyway).
>
> Let's see, a couple thousand miles of border divided over 140,000 troops
> comes to about one soldier per 75 feet -- that'd be ample coverage, wouldn't
> it? Other than the real diehard invaders, they'd not even have to shoot
> anyone, just knowing there's an armed soldier within 37.5' of them should be
> sufficient deterrent.  something for their citizens besides kicking them in the ass in a northward
> orientation and phone number to send the US cash back?>
>
>

How does any of the above prevent international flights being used as missiles?

OK I admit to catching up in reverse order having spent a few days away
from a keyboard but.....are you seriously expecting AQ to launch a
conventional infantry attack upon the USA?

Adam

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5