From: AMBAN 

In article ,
ChrisN says...
>
>On Mar 25, 11:30 pm, "CE"  wrote:
>> 
>>
>> > My opinion is that woman would bring _different_ things to the
>> > priesthood and that in doing so they would bring equal value to the
>> > role.
>> > I don't see how the above view is sexist.
>>
>> I know you don't see it. That's what makes it not only sexist but
>> pathetic as well.
>
>Resorting to abuse is pathetic. Not having a coherent argument to
>support your assertions is pathetic.
>
>> > Returning to the comment you attacked - do you think that a woman
>> > bishop would have put a known pedophile in a position where they would
>> > have access to children?
>>
>> The question is irrelevent since there can be no women priests and
>> therefore no women bishops.
>>
>> However, if you're asking me whether .....
>
>No. I asked a specific question didn't I?
>
>Chris

Chris first of all don't pay attention to this guy.  He has been here
before. He is the polite pompous type that expects all others to fawn on
his "knowledge."  He is a male sexist.  Secondly I think
statistically there are less women pedophiles so there may be truth in what
you say.  Of course the Magdalene Laundries were horrible.

In any case I think the church has blamed women time and time again as being the
temptress going back all the way back to Eve.  I have personal experience
of being blamed in such a manner.  If the church thinks that all men are
helpless next to women it is time they let women take charge.   :-)

My apologies to all my dear male friends who would be quite competent and
are moral as opposed to the hierarchy.

AMBAN
>

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag