From: Adam <""4thwormcastfromthemolehill\"{at}the field.near
the bridge">

Robert Comer wrote:
> Part of the problem here is that the "War on Terror", isn't a war like
> previous ones, the enemy is not so easy to determine, so it's far too
> easy to just label someone an enemy.  There is no Germans, or Japanese
> to target (though what we did to the Japanese American's is pretty
> shameful), the enemy is just an ideal that anyway can be accused of,
> so there *has* to be more controls on just who is labeled an enemy.
>

No different to the "War on Poverty" the "War on Drugs"
or the "War on Cancer"


Find something (an emotion, disease, psychoactive chemical, or social
state) which you can't actually have a war against & declare war
against it.

Works every time as we know that nowadays there ain't no cancer, drugs nor
poverty in the US of A.

Adam

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5