From: Ad 

Rich Gauszka wrote:
> Well at least we can't blame Bush/Rumsfeld for this idea 
>
>
> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,281217,00.html
>
> WASHINGTON —  The Air Force on Tuesday confirmed a report that in 1994 a
> military researcher requested $7.5 million to develop a non-lethal "love
> bomb" that would chemically alter the state of mind of enemy troops and
> make them want to have sex with each other rather than fight.
>
> Air Force spokeswoman Lt. Col. Cathy Reardon said the idea was proposed
> by an Air Force researcher at a lab at Brooks Air Force Base in Texas,
> but it was rejected by the Defense Department. Officials noted that the
> Air Force constantly is considering funding proposals.
>
> No money was spent, Reardon said, and no such weapons are being
> considered. The goal was to create a non-lethal weapon to be used
> against enemy troops.
>
> First reported by KPIX-TV in San Francisco, the discovery of the "gay
> bomb" proposal came from a Freedom of Information Act request made by
> Edward Hammond of Berkeley's Sunshine Project, a watchdog group that
> tracks military spending.
>
> The proposal also offered other ideas, such as a "sex attractant"
> chemical that would make "annoying and injurious creatures" like
> stinging bugs more aggressive and draw them to the enemy's position.
> Another chemical would leave such a strong stench, the enemy would be
> detectable for weeks.
>
> A portion of the proposal notes that some of the chemicals could be used
> on both enemy personnel and civilians and would require decontamination
> countermeasures to nullify the effects.
>
> A Defense Department spokesman told FOX News that he was not aware of
> any "love bomb" proposal but called the idea one of the most
ridiculous
> things he'd heard.
>
>

Maybe instead of being marked "top secret" it's covered under
"don't ask don't tell"



Adam

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5