| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Interesting Proposal |
From: Ad Robert Comer wrote: >> Impressive missiles in that case. Can catch a ICBM going somewhere else >> or a short range high speed asm/ssm/cruise coming straight at you. > > One type can't do that, but two types can -- we are developing more > than 2 types. Heck, plain old vulcan guns stationed outside the > perimeter can protect from a lot of low level incoming. > Unless the vulcans are targeted first. (A) This is (I think) a proposal relating to the radar as the interceptors need a "bit of room to get started". (B) This radar station would be within easy reach of either Iran or Russia. >> There was a reason why Russia threatened the European sites with cruise >> missiles. > > Yeah, they didn't want the missile bases there. > Nope I mean there was a reason why they threatened low level terrain following cruise missiles. >> Also consider the geography of Azerbaijan. One could get very close w/o >> breaking the radar horizon. > > Yep, but it depends on just where you put it and if there is any > overlooking peaks... > consider the geography of Azerbaijan. >> But hey......if you were to adopt a layered defence you'd have to just >> about have to turn all of azerbaijan into a US base. > > I don't think that would be necessary, but don't we already have a > base around there somewhere? > Ummmm.......In the same way Russia has a base in Cuba but it might be tricky putting too much mil kit there much as Khrushchev & Kennedy found. > Besides, I don't really think it's necessary to have a fully wartime > ready installation, it's mere presence puts a kink in a few plans some > might have. (Not just Iran, but Pakistan, Syria, Israel, terrorist > groups.) > Oh indeed. Or wrt the PRC, Russia & India etc it causes a major new nuclear arms race as it means the only way a nuclear power can be sure of beating it is to swamp it. How soon before the PRC & India start moving from 20 to 2000 warheads? Did the SALT treaties (along with possibly the S/IRBM treaties) die when the US pulled out of the ABM treaty? Adam --- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45) SEEN-BY: 633/267 5030/786 @PATH: 379/45 1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.