From: Gary Britt 

You are wrong.  There are a long line of Supreme Court cases that confirm
the constitution does make distinctions between CRIMINAL processes and WAR
processes.

Gary

Phil Payne wrote:
> "Gary Britt"  wrote in message
> news:4671699b$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> Well I think he would or should be entitled to hearing before somebody to
>> determine the appropriateness of his classification as an enemy combatant
> or
>> illegal enemy combatant.  He is not in my view entitled to the right of
>> habeas to force the government to charge him with an ordinary criminal law
>> violation or set him free which is what the court in Al Marri ruled.
> These
>> are two very different kinds of hearings/trials and one is appropriate for
>> this kind of war and one is totally inappropriate for any kind of war.
>
> Your Constitution makes no such distinction.  You're very cavalier about
> which parts of it you support to the death and which parts you discard.
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5