From: Robert Comer 

The guy that this thread was all about originally didn't get any sort of
tribunal, he just sat in solitary for the last 4 years......

--
Bob Comer


On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 10:28:56 -0400, Gary Britt
 wrote:

>Not "enemy",  "Enemy Combatants" and "Illegal
Enemy Combatants", and because
>of the problems you describe these enemy combatants are entitled to a
>hearing before a military tribunal and an appeal to the DC Circuit to
>challenge the rightfulness of their classification and detention.  Unlike
>German and Japanese prisoners of war from world war II.
>
>Gary
>
>Robert Comer wrote:
>> Part of the problem here is that the "War on Terror",
isn't a war like
>> previous ones, the enemy is not so easy to determine, so it's far too
>> easy to just label someone an enemy.  There is no Germans, or Japanese
>> to target (though what we did to the Japanese American's is pretty
>> shameful), the enemy is just an ideal that anyway can be accused of,
>> so there *has* to be more controls on just who is labeled an enemy.
>>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5